[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: toyzone, and other "glitches"
From: Paul Canty
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:39:44 +0100

the questions just generate more questions...

Ian wrote...
IT>1. why are there so few dedicated QA agencies around?

Actually there are a few QA testing houses out there, but they are
expensive and the results aren't always conclusive. I worked briefly
with one company who weren't bad, but they did miss bugs and reported
useability issues which were considered pretty standard.

I guess the ideal would be to perform the service in house and more and
more agencies are doing this now (if in a rudimentary stylee). I would
imagine it would be deadly dull work too, although there are
companies that only produce banner ads now ;-)
(...pause before banner uproar starts...)

Testing and QA are always the final stage in any web development
process, and inevitably get squeezed when deadlines loom. Don't forget
too that things go wrong with stuff all the time. Change something
here, something falls out there....( missing the "add to basket" button
is a good one though!).


IT>2. why the hell are these sites not checking their own functionality
daily
on even a few common platforms?????

Maybe they do a bit, but its shifting sands alot of the time, especially
when the site is being constantly jigged. Things will inevitably screw
up and work one day and not the next. For smaller sites, the "up and out
fast and fix it on the fly" school of thought works for me and with the
pace of the web, fits perfectly with the mindset. The big guys with VC
coming out of their ears and interruption ads on every hoarding have
their heads over the parapet and should be whooped every time something
goes awry. The key is how to deal with it when things screw up...

IT>3. i reckon 99% of users, finding a bust purchase path, will simply leave
forever - don't these guys realise/care??

The fact that you didn't get response from the big guys just shows how
they "don't get it". If they had someone with a bit of email savvy just
acknowledging your complaint, you'd probably feel better, like the
Wagamama thing (although wearing that tshirt in public will make people
will think you work there - seafood ramen please...).

All it takes is someone in the organisation to talk to you, tell you
they're working on it, admit they screwed up, ask you how it could work
better etc, and everyone's much happier.

Some do, but many don't.

IT>4. surely companies with *so little* attention to detail deserve no
sales,
and death (commercial, naturally)

With you on that one mate, although commercial death is too good for
them. Hopefully public humiliation would act as a deterrent too.


Paul
(I'll just pop off and check our live stuff...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
paul canty | paulatpreloaded [dot] com (mailto:paulatpreloaded [dot] com) | http://www.preloaded.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.linkdup.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------


IT> toyzone's very amusing - i just visited the site (urghhhh layout), and
tried
IT> to buy, but when i tried to checkout, it lost everything in my basket,
so i
IT> couldn't buy anything. . . but perhaps this is deliberate breaking of
the
IT> purchase path whilst they sort their little pricing bugs out. . .

IT> also tried to buy a CD on audiostreet.co.uk today - absolutely no joy -
it
IT> was impossible to check out, and their customer services couldn't take
an
IT> order over the phone. . .although they were very apologetic (are your
IT> cookies on??? YES!!!!!!)

IT> a few weeks ago, argos overcharged me by �20, and are not only refusing
to
IT> back down, but even to contemplate answering the points raised in
various
IT> emails (in fact, took the unusual step of inferring that I was a liar,
IT> repeatedly - so i reported them to the IMRG, hehe! but not exactly in
IT> anticipation of any action ;-0 <ducks as steve rolls into action>). i'm
IT> looking forward to a full chargeback on my credit card. . .

IT> breathe had a bug last week, which stopped people logging into their
IT> webmail - to their credit, they did fix it within a day (after i emailed
IT> someone i know that works there), but they ignored the email i sent
through
IT> the site warning them. . .

IT> wagamama.co.uk had a completely broken purchase path a few weeks ago -
IT> again, they hadn't noticed, but fixed it very quickly when told (and
gave me
IT> a lovely t-shirt, hurrah!).

IT> 2 days ago, la redoute's site was lacking "add to basket" button (and
hence
IT> the ability to purchase). . .

IT> now a few questions -

IT> 1. why are there so few dedicated QA agencies around?
IT> 2. why the hell are these sites not checking their own functionality
daily
IT> on even a few common platforms?????
IT> 3. i reckon 99% of users, finding a bust purchase path, will simply
leave
IT> forever - don't these guys realise/care??
IT> 4. surely companies with *so little* attention to detail deserve no
sales,
IT> and death (commercial, naturally)

IT> Glad to get that off my chest - i was gutted when the only place i could
IT> find the excellent "Escape to Samsara" was audiostreet, and then
couldn't
IT> buy it. . .

IT> but seriously, there's a great market for a SWAT QA team out there - if
only
IT> to name and shame the guilty - Mike, have you thought of having a weekly
IT> "hall of shame" in NMA?

IT> laterz,


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesatukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesatukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  UKNM: toyzone, and other "glitches", Ian Tester

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]