[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: yahoo was Re: UKNM: Word.com
From: Tim Ireland
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:21:30 GMT

> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 10:29:20AM -0000, Tim Ireland wrote:
> > From: Tonya Peck <tonyaatdigittante [dot] com>
> >
> > <snip>
> > > besides, Yahoo is successful for a lot of reasons not ONE of them
being
> > for
> > > its design.
> >
> > Or functionality, for that matter...
>
> uh? it has very good functionality - java chat client, java messenger,
> web email, web based calender and web based bookmarks. all of these
> work together.
>
> the search is inferior to google but then its strength is the human
> compiled directory of links.
>
> in fact it would be hard to think of a site with better design,
> functionality and ease of use.

Pointless comparing Google to Yahoo. The OPD, despite some minor human
weaknesses already discussed, blows Yahoo out of the water in terms of
category searching. Because it doesn't work efficiently enough, Yahoo falls
on its arse in terms of this - its major function. The other extras may just
keep it afloat once the public wises up to dmoz.org...

Tim Ireland
Senior Copywriter, Designercity (www.designercity.com)
http://www.buymybook.co.uk/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: yahoo was Re: UKNM: Word.com, Severina Publications

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]