Re: UKNM: Re: UKNM Digest V1 #178

[jim smith]

At 4:23 pm +0100 on 30/4/99 you said:

>> Someone who has a site, which is quite good, functions well etc.

>> but is built using frames quite heavily. They say to you "we want

>> to be higher in the search engines", after explaining to them about

>> frames and search engines...what would you advise them to do?

>> Re-build their site from scratch? Make do with the present site,

>> and tweak other areas (metas etc.)?

>

>If they are contemplating a redesign, tell them this is a good time to

>dump frames. Otherwise, the reality is you'll probably have to work

>within the existing site, making tweaks and possible use of doorway

>pages. But if they are really keen on doing well at search engines, then

>I'd come down heavily that the frames need to go.

>

>By the way, thanks to those who mentioned my site. If you want a

>page particularly on the topic of search engines and frames, see

>http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/frames.html

>

>cheers,

>danny


*cough*


<NOFRAMES> + javascript


stef was right about learning HTML...


*cough*


--//--------------------------------------------------------------------

jim smith -

jimflenser [dot] co [dot] uk

  -  http://www.flenser.co.uk  0961 319040

everything has been said, provided words do not change their meanings or

meanings their words                                         -- alpha 60 

********************

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.

Email Khalil Ibrahimi

khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com)

 to advertise on Excite.

********************

Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html