Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: Site structure in flash |
From: | David Gary |
Date: | Wed, 26 Aug 1998 22:08:16 +0100 |
> > And those sites would be?
> > You also said "Any Flash designer can upgrade to the Generator
> > Developers
> > Studio at low cost" ($199.00 from macromedia's web site. This is for
> > the
> > upgrade, if you don't have the prior generator, which I am sure many
> > don't
> > have.It will be $499.00 Which is more than Flash itself!)"
> >
Hiya Jester,
If you are charging even the minimal base price for your Flash work, Im sure
the
ISP's small increase in revenue wont make that big of a difference. The
bottom line is,
if the client wants "on the spot updates" you provide them with a
"generated" server.
Its simple, simply bill the client for that "optional" service. Business
that can afford "state of the art" wouldnt be pinched in the slightest will
those prices. If your getting payed to update the "generated" site the
client should be paying the subscription fee for the ISP and most
developers charge double or more just to process it.
Thats how technology and the economy work. To stay on the "cutting edge"
takes
money and more than usual. The company or person paying for your services
should pay if they want the latest technology, not you. So whats the big
deal?
If its not a standard, its an option. Ever buy a new car, know what you pay
for the "options"?
-DG-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: Site structure in flash, Jean Dukate
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]