Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: ZDNET's Comparison Flash v. LiveMotion |
From: | daniel gray |
Date: | Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:16:37 +0100 |
Gary DeJarnett wrote:
> In case anyone�s interested in another article comparing Flash and
> LiveMotion, here�s another one:
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/devhead/stories/articles/0,4413,2495481,00.html
> <http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?28610:1622836>
>
> I don�t really agree with it because the author doesn�t compare the size of
> the resulting files from each program.
I dunno, Gary. I thought the article was pretty fair. He mentions the
bitmap issue on http://www.zdnet.com/devhead/stories/articles/0,4413,2495522,00.html
The designer must have the discipline to stay away from the effects if
file size is the ultimate issue. (Or smash things down with the
per-object compression.)
How much bigger are your LiveMotion SWFs than comparable Flash SWFs?
I'd love to see a range of comparisons, vectors to vectors.
Cheers,
Dan
http://geekbooks.com ------- blatant sig hype to follow -------------
* "The Complete Guide to Associate and Affiliate Programs on the Net -
Turning Clicks Into Cash" (McGraw-Hill) 100% Snake Oil Free!
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World�s Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California
-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: ZDNET's Comparison Flash v. L, Gregg Caines
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]