UKNM: Fast loading, blah! etc.

[John Braithwaite]

Paul Murphy wrote:

> ultimately the responsibility for fast downloads *HAS* to reside with the

> website owners, putting up another crappy bloated site about some dreadful

> product isn't doing the world any favours whatever the designer/producer

> might think.


and then Ian Fenn wrote:

At a creative level I'd have more of a problem with a crappy bloated

site for a great product or a great site for a dreadful product.

Technically, I'd agree with you - crappy bloated sites use more

bandwidth... which slows down access to other sites ultimately.


John Braithwaite suggests:


No site has an excuse to be crappy and bloated. Even the ones that offer

lashings of Flash or Video images should give the user the option (and

warning) of weight of information that will be transmitted (it's only

reasonable and fair!): Give me a good reason why a site can be bloated and

I'll give you a site that no-one goes to. 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

post new media vacancies for free

uknm-jobschinwag [dot] com

*******************

sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact

saleschinwag [dot] com

 for more details.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or

helpchinwag [dot] com