uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: UKNM: More webwashing |
From: | Charlie.Williams |
Date: | Tue, 18 May 1999 13:48:17 +0100 |
Charlie Williams@ECSOFT
18/05/99 10:38
Rick wrote:
>>Charlie Williams said:
>> It seems to have crossed the
>>line that seperates info sites with an acceptable number of banners from
>>banner sites with a bit of info at the bottom of each page.
>
>How many are OK? Don't you only get one ad on the page?
You get a standard banner across the top, plus an big ad-stuffed column
down the right flank.
>> Before the
>>re-design it looked fairly okay, ie: nondescript as a text-based info site
>>should be, plus a couple of easily-ignorable banners. Now it just looks
>>shite.
>>
>>This is what happens when web designers assume users don't mind ads.
>
>Not really sure why shite web design means the ads on the site should be
>blamed.
We're talking about delivery of text-based info (Usenet posts). Essentially
the simplest of designs is all that's required. However, when ads are added
to the mix, a whole lot more thought needs to go into page layout. Trying
too hard to fit the ads in has compromised the user interface. IMHO.
Charlie.
********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]