uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | UKNM: BBC Advertising and digital TV |
From: | Ray Taylor |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:38:42 +0100 |
So it seems that at long last the BBC may be allowed to accept advertising
on public service channels from other commercial organisations.
The BBC is a well known for making extensive use of its own free airtime to
promote its own commercial services and "joint ventures" including beeb.
According to the FT (inky pinky version) a government panel could allow
advertising for the first time on public service TV. But not, it seems, on
BBC1 or BBC2 whose advertising slots will continue to be reserved for BBC
programmes, magazines, web sites and tee shirts.
Apparently consideration is being given to relaxing the no-ads rule as an
alternative to charging digital TV users an extra �30 on their compulsory
state monopoly subsidy fee (TV licence).
Now I know that criticising the BBC on this list is a bit like taking sweets
away from children, and yes haven't those public-spirited people that have
run Aunty Beeb over the centuries done a wonderful job at raising the
standards of TV in this country, etc, etc, but haven't Sky and OnDigital
just entered into a consumer price war? And isn't this just part of the big
bad world of capitalism?
If Sky and/or On do a reasonable job of it once the industry has settled
down, do we need a BBC TV digital option? Is it fair to impose a �30 tax on
new digital TV subscribers? Does it not go against anti-monopoly principles
to add �30 per customer to the cost of running commercial digital TV and
deduct �30 per customer from the cost of BBC digital?
Yes, of course the BBC will die a death if is not able to adapt to digital,
but then the same is true for Sky and the ITV companies.
This is not the 1930s. Is there any need for further public subsidies in TV
broadcasting given the huge amount of money generated commercially?
The corporation should be broken up. BBC broadcasting, the BBC brand name,
and the organisation's various commercial interests should be open to bid
from commercial TV consortia. Program innovation should continue to be
subsidised and supported by government, possibly including the continuation
of a form of the licence fee, but any funds should be available to any group
of people who can put a good case together for being able to produce
excellent, creative, innovative and commercially viable programming.
Production is already subcontracted, so why not open up the process of
bidding for those contracts, rather than allowing the money to flow through
the old-boys network?
Ray Taylor
NMC/Adplan +44 181 639 0015
The interactive advertising agency
********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html
Replies
Re: UKNM: BBC Advertising and digital TV, Nabil Shabka
Re: UKNM: BBC Advertising and digital TV, Jamie Unwin
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]