uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: UKNM: 'Wacky Names' |
From: | Richard Uttley |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:33:30 +0100 |
I think that there may be a little more to this IMHO. When you isolate a
brand (ie divorce it from its peers and its environment) then you could say
that the experience is the brand. But when it's taken in comparison then
perceptions can change. If you hadn't experienced Amazon or similarly
functional sites would you still say that Boo was badly designed? It may
have been difficult to use, but if there had been nothing better it would
have been seen as a leader in the field and the brand may well have grown.
Another point for discussion is the use of the term "image" when describing
a business. Personally I prefer to think of a business having a personality
- like a colleague. A good branding policy will leave me feeling confident
that I could predict what a company would do under a given set of conditions
without ever having witnessed it respond to those conditions before. So if I
received the wrong product from Amazon (and I haven't to date) I would
confidently predict that they would change it immediately, pay the carriage
costs both ways and give me a �5 gift voucher for the inconvenience.
To me "image" is just that; a projection without substance. Brand is a known
persona (good or bad).
Wassat worth? A penny or two?
Richard M Uttley
Marketing Director
Netstep
e-mail: richardnetstep [dot] co [dot] uk
www: http://www.netstep.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Carrington [samcsensei [dot] co [dot] uk (mailto:samcsensei [dot] co [dot] uk)]
Sent: 17 July 2000 18:25
To: 'uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com'
Subject: Re: UKNM: 'Wacky Names'
I agree with Tsugumi, but for my tuppence, I felt it worth adding that
(IMHO) A brand name and a brand experience are two very different entities
- this is also true on the net. A product's image is not defined purely by
the name, it is largely a result of the experience of the site and its
features.
Hence although boo created a 'strong brand' in the traditional sense;
consistent communication, strong logotypes, etc, they failed to
create a useful and smooth user experience, thus fundamentally damaging
their brand values. Google demonstrates an example of a concept or product
which with limited publicity, and a minimal corporate identity has created
a strong online brand through quality user experience. Amazon presents, in
my mind, a good synergy of the two aspects - traditional brand identity,
strong branding due to the name and its associations (discussed in
earlier threads), and a productive, useful user experience.
Its fair to say that the brand _is_ the experience in this context, rather
than being just the result of the image projected. This is to a great
degree the result of the web being an interactive media, where a two way
transaction takes place between site and client. I think a great many
agencies have trouble grasping this interaction - especially if they are
founded in tradtional, or 'one-way' medias such as print and TV.
I have a vague recollection of posting something similar to the above in
the past, but thought I'd rephrase my thoughts and see if they made any
more 'sense' (sorry!) second time round.
sam carrington // senior web developer // sensei.co.uk
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Tsugumi Anai wrote:
> Building a brand both online and offline is not just about the name. The
> brand conveys a message about a business. A strong brand can be built
around
> either a wacky or a conservative name providing it has values and
attributes
> that appeal to the target audience, and providing it delivers on its
> 'promise'.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
UKNM: Wacky Buzzwords, David Burrows
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]