No Subject

[Chinwag]

<

2FEAB403106DD31188D800508B4496D1026D283Clon_exch_1 [dot] pangolin [dot] co [dot] uk

>

From: Mario Tilney-Bassett <

Mario [dot] Tilney-Bassettsportal [dot] net

>

To: "

'uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

'" <

uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

>

Subject: RE: UKNM: just35.com - what do you think ?

Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:13:18 +0100

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"

Sender:

ownerchinwag [dot] com

Precedence: bulk

Reply-To:

uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

X-Hosted-By: http://www.info-com.com

X-Website: http://www.chinwag.com


I imagine the 35 will become the 35 best payers...


Good work by the Just 35 guys in creating a discussion and interest here...


But dont they know that UKNM only ever picks holes in ideas....


-----Original Message-----

From: Sam Michel [

samchinwag [dot] com (mailto:samchinwag [dot] com)

]

Sent: 17 July 2000 08:46

To:

uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com

Subject: RE: UKNM: just35.com - what do you think ?


The discussion on just35.com has...ummm...interesting, although I can't

help feeling there's more than the usual ramping at work by interested

parties. I, too, noticed the adverts during Channel 4's Emillionaire show

but wasn't enticed to the site. I only really had a look when

Thesite.org.uk said they'd been banned!


The concept seems flawed to me, perhaps I'm missing something, but...


- what happens when the best '35' sites in each category are superceeded by

a better site in that category? Will just35.com remove a 'lesser' site,

presumably refunding their money, and replace it with a better one?

- 35 sites in any one category seems awfully restrictive given the enormous

number of new sites launching every day?


If it does work, great for everyone involved, but it does seem alarmingly

short-termist. Perhaps I'm missing the bigger picture here?


Toodle Pip


Sam



At 23:42 15/07/00 -0700, Bex wrote:

>I simply wouldn't use it. It's obviously a service people pay to be listed

>in, so why would I assume they could do it better for me than I could?

Finding

>35 sites/companies in each category might take me a week, with all the

>evaluative processes necessary, but at least I'd be judging them on the

>criteria that

>are important to me, not on ability to pay.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Sam Michel - Founder - http://www.chinwag.com

                     e:

samchinwag [dot] com

Home of the UK-Netmarketing, UKNM-jobs, Flasher,

Shockwave and other mailing lists.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.

 ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working

 http://www.ukaffiliates.com /

salesukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesukaffiliates [dot] com)

 telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or

helpchinwag [dot] com