Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: Re: Fonts (was What hardware should I buy?) |
From: | KJ |
Date: | Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:27:01 +0100 |
>So is it general consensus that the best idea is to use TrueType fonts for
Flash?
Type 1 and TrueType are often two types of fonts at the same level of
quality. Sometimes they are different. When True Type first came out they
got a bad rap because some were rip offs (literally) of Type 1 fonts. Some
of the bad press was also likely spread by the Type Foundries becasue they
could no longer sell $200 per typeface fonts anymore. Common thought was
Type 1 were good and True Type were bad. This was probably too simplistic an
answer, however. Some TrueType were poorly constructed while others were so
good that they were exact copies of Type 1 fonts TypeCase from Swfte were
not allowed to sell their fonts for some time because of this.
It was also said that you should NEVER mix Type 1 and True Type. At the time
I was working at a Forms Design house and we sent tons of files out for
negs. I often used Type 1 and True Type and sometimes both if needed. Only
fonts I ever had a problem with were Type 1. This was because Foundries
often do what designers do---They look back at their work and think that
what had looked good would look better if they tweaked it a bit. The result
was that a 1988 version of Helvetica and a 1994 version of Helvetica might
be ever so slightly different. The result was that the sometimes 6 point
type I was setting no longer matched the breaks of the previous job I might
be correcting. What made matters worse was that I might have gotten the
original job from an outside vendor who no longer was in business with the
result that instead of stripping in a paragraph I might need to reset the
whole thing. (Banks in particular wanted everything in exactly the spot they
wanted which was sometimes nearly impossible.)
Probably way more than you wanted to know about fonts and typefaces.
Bottom line. I doubt that 1 in 10,000 would tell the difference between Type
1 and TrueType fonts on a web project. What you can tell the difference on
are poorly designed typefaces regardless of the format. So.... for my money
use Truetype whenever possible. They are cheaper and are often designed by
the same foundries and they don't cause the NT problems listed.
That said it is inexcusable IMO for Adobe to not do a better job with fonts
than they do. They bought Fontminder, a good type management tool to put
them out of business. They load fonts for their programs without having some
type of coding to prevent you from unloading essential fonts. Try Acrobat,
Pagemaker and Photoshop and accidentally remove one of their "required"
fonts that they don't list.
and...the NT bug which they know about and haven't fixed is another one.
Couple that with their abandonment of PageMaker owners for InDesign and I
think they are worse than the company that usually gets bashed.
Kevin Jackson
kjacksontriskelian [dot] com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: helpchinwag [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]