Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: W3C opinion of flash |
From: | Laura Mollett |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2000 20:09:03 +0100 |
> At 6:27 PM 5/15/0, Laura Mollett wrote:
>> Is Macromedia a member of the W3C and if not, why not? :)
>
> Yup... we're on a couple of the rich-media working groups, like SVG and SMIL.
Well then I'd say the w3c's opinion of flash is good and very realistic - at
least in *some* quarters ;)
Is it going to be possible to integrate the htmlish advantages of svg and
the like to flash and director? well it must be... that's what LM does or
tries to do, yes? ...although the only part that really works yet is the
swf... the w3c standards are sooo slow (I understand why, but it's still
frustrating)... any ideas on when some of this stuff may be workable and how
MacroMedia might deal with it?
> You can find a full member list at:
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
Thanks for the link John :)
Laura
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml
Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]