Re: FLASH: site check: kerb

[Matt Coyne]

I guess it's just a subjective thing then. I like the fact that it is

contained, though I can see the prob if viewing at anything higher than

1024x768. The windows could be made resizeable but can it be fixed to be

proportional resizing?


plus, the 'relative window size' script that Branden shared with us could be

utilised to create a window based on the visitors monitor.


but my main consideration with new windows is the design control, plus the

fact that, as you said, it helps 'fixing the resolution for raster-heavy

SWFs' *and* heavy vector animated SWF's.


is it such a pain? (not a gripe but a genuine question)


on 17/4/00 5:18 pm, Gregg Caines at

cainussprint [dot] ca

 wrote:


> My biggest problem with new windows is that they are

> usually fixed in their size.  Flash is easily scalable, so

> this seems like a waste of Flash's abilities.  It's also kind

> of annoying on my 1280 X 1024 monitor as the window

> shows up in one corner, and is almost too tiny to be

> readable.  I know 1280 X 1024 is not the average, but I

> can gaurantee that one day it will be (in the next 2 yrs),

> and those pop-ups will all need to be redone.

> 

> I guess I'm asking 'why?' in response to your 'why not?'...

> Do they have benefits?  I've never used them, and if there

> is some benefit (aside from fixing the resolution for raster-

> heavy SWFs), I'd like to be given a clue...

> 





:  t  h  r  e  e  z  e  r  o  :





flasher is generously supported by...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW

    http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml


 Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email

helpchinwag [dot] com