Re: FLASH: OT?: and why not swf a w3c standard?

[Michael@BTW]

----- Original Message -----

From: unique <

uniqueptd [dot] net

>


Last I heard they were considering Shout3d's implementation of the java3d

api for a w3 standard, its not as if a commercial implementation is taboo at

the w3c so why not swf instead of SVG? It seems like adopting a widely used

commercial standard would make more sense than putting out yet another

plug-in or new browser requiring 'standard' that will take years to be

widely enough supported for developers to rely on (after all, swf is still

the most reliable way to deliver PNG and how long ago did PNG become a

'standard';-)..


> >the W3 to make flash a standard?

>

> Tee-hee.

>

> They seem to prefer SVG, seems to me.

>

> >That's why we have to make really

> >kewl stuff so that people everywhere luv flash more.

>

> BTW it's not cool to spell "cool" as "kewl";

> nor is it cool to spell "love" as "luv";

> nor is it cool to spell "Flash" as "flash".


But Kewell is cool here in Cali anyway...


>

> HTH.

>

> >And that's why one

> >ought not bet the whole site on Flash.


Well not Flash 4...




flasher is generously supported by...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW

    http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml


 Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to

http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email

helpchinwag [dot] com