[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: re: RE: Re: UKNM: The next stage in the game - ?????
From: Ben Scott-Robinson
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:39:06 +0100

I think we should differentiate between Open, the development platform (a hideously
expensive proprietory setup similarish to Macromedia Director, and used across Europe by a
large number of satellite and cable companies), and Open.... (four dots) the ex-BIB
conglomerate who have paid a rather large amount of money to provide the content for the
BSkyB interactive offering.

Not the same thing...

that's all


> ** Original Subject: RE: Re: UKNM: The next stage in the game - ?????
> ** Original Sender: Steve Johnston <Steve [dot] JohnstonatEntranet [dot] co [dot] uk>
> ** Original Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:00:27 +0100

> ** Original Message follows...

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Clay Shirky [clayatshirky [dot] com (mailto:clayatshirky [dot] com)]
>
> > I'm sure you're right about it bringing interactivity to a new group
> > of people - the devices we have are far too difficult to use. I don't
> > think new devices equal new protocols, though. New devices will have
> > to interoperate with the existing net or they will fail. If Open
> > doesn't get a real web browser, it won't be around in 6 months time.
>
> On the 6 month prognosis for Open, I beg to differ. I reckon that Open
> is reaching a great many people already who have never gone near an
> internet-enabled PC. Sure, it is slow, but it's media rich; it has
> limited offerings, which are growing; but more than anything, it is out
> there big style and it is bloody easy to use. I can't believe I am
> saying this but, Open is delivering a stable, user-friendly environment
> that is reaching a lot of people. It is safe for a long, long time (in
> internet time) yet. I was sceptical, until my 62 year old father bought
> the soundtrack to Notting Hill from Woolworths though it - you should
> see the trouble he is having with the iMac my mother bought three months
> ago.
>
> Give *me* a choice and the TV access I want will *have* to be Web
> enabled. But if you don't know what you're missing.....
>
> As a qualifier Clay, as I know you are picky about this stuff (no
> sarcasm intended), I am basing these opinions on my own experience, that
> of my father and in the knowledge that there are around 1,000,000
> return-path-enabled Open set-top boxes already in consumers homes.
>
> Steve Johnston
> steve [dot] johnstonatentranet [dot] co [dot] uk
> Mobile +44 (0)7901 853273
> Office +44 (0)1491 878787

When the going gets weird,
The weird turn pro.

********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html



Replies
  Re: RE: Re: UKNM: The next stage in the , Clay Shirky
  re: RE: Re: UKNM: The next stage in the , Chris Heathcote

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]