uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: UKNM: Internet advertising - abuse of hit rates |
From: | Mat Morrison |
Date: | Wed, 9 Sep 1998 15:01:14 +0100 |
I'm sure everyone else will pitch in with a response to this. Almost
certainly, Mr Foan of ABCe will have an answer.
My experience is not the same as yours -- the media owners I deal with do
their best to be accurate (some are *beginning* to offer campaign auditing
-- rather than the rather less useful Site Audit).
My concern is *why* you want this information? If it's for media purposes,
you only *really* ned to know how many times your ad was shown. If you don't
trust 'em, put the ad and script on your own server.
Incidentally, if you have a slow server, then reported click-through and
referrer logs won't match... (they never do, really, but the disparity will
be higher).
M.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jo [jocan-u-hack-it [dot] com (mailto:jocan-u-hack-it [dot] com)]
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 1998 9:23 PM
> To: uk-netmarketing (E-mail)
> Subject: UKNM: Internet advertising - abuse of hit rates
>
>
> On the topic of Internet advertising, is there any means of verifying
> whether site owners are being accurate about their hit rates? In my
> experience, exaggeration and outright lying are rife - as is
> the tendency
> to count total hits (with graphics and called frames), rather
> than total
> visitors.
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> Jo @ CAN-U-HACK-IT
> Internet and Publicity Services
>
>
>
Replies
RE: UKNM: Internet advertising - abuse o, Harry Parkes
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]