[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: UKNM: 'higher levels of depression and loneliness'
From: Mat Morrison
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 23:09:46 +0100

Steve -- fully appreciate your point re: provenance/past performance of
HCII.

However, I am sure that, with your academic background and experience, you
will agree that the struggle for publication/tenure rarely encourages one to
come up with tame papers. Multiply UK experience by (US academic salary/UK
academic salary) and you'll come close to the pressure HCII is under...

Despite appearances to the contrary, I am not suggesting that there was any
preconceived end-in-mind, but I do believe that there is a general
discursive trend away from "internet hype" towards a more spartan "internet
reality".

As a result, there is intense pressure to maintain presence in the academic
marketplace and come up with research results at least as
powerful/eye-catching/media friendly as past projects. This tends to affect
both data, and analysis functions.(Incidentally, in their biogs, both
Kiesler and Kraut describe HomeNet almost as an after thought, as an
ancillary project to their main interests.)

HCII is as subject to the trends of common discourse, politics and the
market as any other discursive node. Research (especially psychological
research) never occupies a cultural vacuum. If you don't believe me, ask
this simple question: what do Eysenck, craniometry and Koko the gorilla have
in common?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Bowbrick [steveatwebmedia [dot] com (mailto:steveatwebmedia [dot] com)]
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 1998 4:43 PM
> To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com
> Subject: RE: UKNM: 'higher levels of depression and loneliness'
>
>
> At 10:57 04/09/98 +0100, you wrote:
> >I'm being flip, but I don't like this kind of ivory-tower
> self-selecting,
> >localised, predetermined result-in-mind-based research at
> all. Plus -- would
> >there have been a hoohah if they'd come up with anything positive?
>
> If this were a different research team I would have agreed
> but this is the
> HCI INstitute team at CMU, a pioneering advocate of the
> online life in most
> areas. Most likely that they were actually expecting the
> reverse of the
> final result. Sponsors certainly were.
>

> --
> Steve Bowbrick Webmedia Group
> 0171 494 3177 0468 257 570
>
>
>

http://www.webmedia.com/steve steveatwebmedia [dot] com (mailto:steveatwebmedia [dot] com)




http://www.bowbrick.com - he's very advanced for his age...



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]