[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Why is Bepaid so bad?
From: Kief Morris
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:38:57 +0100

Nick Horley typed the following on 16:11 05/07/00 +0100
>Could someone please remind what the arguments against bepaid are supposed
>to be (sorry, have accidentally erased all my old email)?
>
>I've just had a look at the site - I like the principle behind it and am
>going to give it a try. I only wish I could filter the stuff that comes
>through my door in the same way. 20 pizza flyers, 10 minicab cards and 2
>credit card invites is a small selection from my average weekly harvest in
>oh-so-targetable Fulham. One of my neighbours displays a large sign saying
>"no pizzas or indian food" on his door. I bet he would like bepaid as
well.

From your comments, it sounds like the principle behind bepaid is
that it stops you from getting any spam other than what you want?
I had the impression bepaid was actually about giving you targeted
ads *in addition to* what you already get from other sources. I don't
see how this would help your neighbour.

The Wildest party on the Net is about to begin ...
http://www.Wild5.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesatukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesatukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  UKNM: Why is Bepaid so bad?, Nick Horley

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]