uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: UKNM: RE: Conflicting Statistics |
From: | ben |
Date: | Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:13:48 +0100 |
Damien,
Happily and in 5 minutes off the top of my head.
1) Your method of recruitment is self-selecting. Trouble is the people
selecting themselves are those after a couple of pounds here and there. They
are not the ABC1's most advertisers want.
2) The information you have about the customer is fixed, based on what the
customer told you and may not be accurate.
3) By specifying that certain areas may pay more interests (up to $120 an
hour) you may actually be encouraging users to select interests based on
their perceived guess as to where the top bits of income are going to be and
not on their actual interests.
4) By not watching where people visit there is no confirmation that the
information contained in 2 is accurate. Little or no follow-up information
is going to be available. As such I don't know what proportion of the people
I'm buying to watch my ads are what they say they are (say Company
directors) and not Burger Flippers at MacDonalds.
5) Finally for now, you are judging the quality of your results by
click-thro ratio's. Not a reliable measure at the best of times (it doesn't
relate to any tangible result in the way that an affliate marketing scheme
could). Furthermore, it is possible to encourage people to visit the site by
offering them extra money to do so. Doesn't that somewhat screw the value of
these figures.
And that's merely based on your reasons to sign up page and the top of my
head. I could go through the advertising age reasons but there is a basis of
an awfully good system in there and I'm not going to give it away here. "
As for the advertising ages. I don't have them I just remember the article
(it was called something like SuperBowl 2005).
Ben
Damian Jennings" <damian [dot] jenningsbepaid [dot] com> wrote ..
> Please share with us what you perceive our flaws to be.
>
> If this gets too off-topic, I would love to carry on off list. However,
> you can't just put something like that without your thoughts as to why
> our business plan is 'massively flawed'.
>
> We don't all have the last 8 years worth of advertising age.
>
> Damian Jennings
> bepaid.com
[Sam says: msg chopped for brevity]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: UKNM: RE: Conflicting Statistics, Jay Gooby
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]